首页> 外文OA文献 >Triage, treatment and transfer of patients with stroke in emergency department trial (the T(3) Trial): a cluster randomised trial protocol
【2h】

Triage, treatment and transfer of patients with stroke in emergency department trial (the T(3) Trial): a cluster randomised trial protocol

机译:急诊科试验(T(3)试验)中风患者的分类,治疗和转移:整群随机试验方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Internationally recognised evidence-based guidelines recommend appropriate triage of patients with stroke in emergency departments (EDs), administration of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and proactive management of fever, hyperglycaemia and swallowing before prompt transfer to a stroke unit to maximise outcomes. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness in EDs of a theory-informed, nurse-initiated, intervention to improve multidisciplinary triage, treatment and transfer (T(3)) of patients with acute stroke to improve 90-day death and dependency. Organisational and contextual factors associated with intervention uptake also will be evaluated. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, parallel group, cluster randomised trial with blinded outcome assessment will be conducted in EDs of hospitals with stroke units in three Australian states and one territory. EDs will be randomised 1:1 within strata defined by state and tPA volume to receive either the T(3) intervention or no additional support (control EDs). Our T(3) intervention comprises an evidence-based care bundle targeting: (1) triage: routine assignment of patients with suspected stroke to Australian Triage Scale category 1 or 2; (2) treatment: screening for tPA eligibility and administration of tPA where applicable; instigation of protocols for management of fever, hyperglycaemia and swallowing; and (3) transfer: prompt admission to the stroke unit. We will use implementation science behaviour change methods informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework [1, 2] consisting of (i) workshops to determine barriers and local solutions; (ii) mixed interactive and didactic education; (iii) local clinical opinion leaders; and (iv) reminders in the form of email, telephone and site visits. Our primary outcome measure is 90 days post-admission death or dependency (modified Rankin Scale >2). Secondary outcomes are health status (SF-36), functional dependency (Barthel Index), quality of life (EQ-5D); and quality of care outcomes, namely, monitoring and management practices for thrombolysis, fever, hyperglycaemia, swallowing and prompt transfer. Outcomes will be assessed at the patient level. A separate process evaluation will examine contextual factors to successful intervention uptake. At the time of publication, EDs have been randomised and the intervention is being implemented. DISCUSSION: This theoretically informed intervention is aimed at addressing important gaps in care to maximise 90-day health outcomes for patients with stroke.
机译:背景:国际公认的循证指南建议在急诊室(ED)中对中风患者进行适当的分流,组织纤溶酶原激活物(tPA)的管理,并在迅速转移至中风病房前积极管理发烧,高血糖和吞咽以最大程度地提高结果。我们的目的是评估一种由理论指导,由护士发起的干预措施,以改善急性卒中患者的多学科分类,治疗和转移(T(3)),以改善90天死亡和依赖性,在ED中的有效性。与干预措施相关的组织和背景因素也将得到评估。方法:这项前瞻性,多中心,平行组,随机分组的,具有盲目的结果评估的随机试验将在澳大利亚三个州和一个地区的中风单位医院的急诊室进行。 ED将在状态和tPA量定义的层次内按1:1随机分配,以接受T(3)干预或不接受其他支持(对照ED)。我们的T(3)干预措施包括针对循证的护理包,其针对性是:(1)分诊:将疑似中风的患者常规分配为澳大利亚分诊量表的1级或2级; (2)治疗:筛查tPA资格并在适用时给予tPA;刺激发烧,高血糖和吞咽的治疗方案; (3)调动:迅速录取到卒中单元。我们将使用理论领域框架[1,2]提供的实施科学行为更改方法,这些方法包括:(i)研讨会以确定障碍和本地解决方案; (ii)互动式与教学式混合教育; (iii)当地临床意见领袖; (iv)电子邮件,电话和实地访问形式的提醒。我们的主要结局指标是入院后90天死亡或依赖(修订的Rankin量表> 2)。次要结果是健康状况(SF-36),功能依赖性(Barthel Index),生活质量(EQ-5D);以及护理结果的质量,即对溶栓,发烧,高血糖,吞咽和及时转移的监测和管理措施。结果将在患者水平评估。单独的过程评估将检查成功干预措施采用的背景因素。在出版时,急诊室已经随机化,并且正在实施干预措施。讨论:这种理论上有根据的干预措施旨在解决重要的护理缺口,以使中风患者的90天健康结果最大化。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号